Open letter to Scooter Software

Hi,

Just thought you'd be thrilled to know that I narrowly avoided purchasing a copy of Beyond Compare today. I'd read through the feature list and it looked pretty nice, so I was all set to whip out my credit card, but couldn't find any mention of how much it cost anywhere on your site. Presumably that would have been revealed once I'd added it to the shopping cart, or do you cheeky monkeys wait until credit card details have been entered?

Either way, nice work on hiding valuable information from potential buyers, thus steering them towards free products that do much the same thing. I'll probably never know how much money you've saved me today, but every little bit counts, so thanks.

Regards,
John Carney

Posted

Why Web Developers Hate Internet Explorer

The graph below shows the rate at which users of Internet Explorer upgrade to newer versions. Note that IE8 is the first version of IE that can be described as standards-compliant. While few web developers still bother IE6, many of us are required to continue supporting IE7's frustrating quirks, and will probably be doing so for quite some time to come.

Internet Explorer version adoption

Compare that to the upgrade adoption rate for Google's Chrome.

Chrome version adoption

Filed under  //  browser   chrome   ie7   ie8   internet explorer   web development  
Posted

My response to @billablog's "Why books are better than Kindle"

Recently @Billablog (who is definitely worth following, by the way) posted a bunch of reasons why books are better than Kindle. Unfortunately, many of his points are outdated, weak, oversimplifactions, or just plain wrong.

Don't get me wrong; I love printed books. But I do own an iPad and I do use it as, amongst other things, an eReader. So here is my response to Bill's points:

1. If you lose one, you’ve only lost one.

True, but if I lose my bookshelf I can't go back to the store and get all my books replaced for free like I can with my collection of eBooks.

2. You can loan a book to a friend.

US Kindle owners can lend their books to their friends. Hopefully the feature will be offered in other countries, and on other platforms when publishers realise that the sky isn't going to fall on their heads if they do so.

Also, when you lend an eBook, you're guaranteed to get it back.

3. Or you can borrow one.

US Kindle owners can also borrow ebooks from their local libraries.

4. You don’t have to turn it off when your flight is taking off or landing.

So I can't read my ebook for 5-10 minutes out of my flight time? Meh.

5. Others can see what you’re reading. You might make a new friend based on a common interest.

How many friends, exactly, have you made on this basis alone? How often, approximately, has this ever happened in the entire history of the universe?

6. You can impress your date with the type of books on your shelves. Or, you can see what your date is interested in by their shelves. Both excellent conversation starters.

Agreed, but if you've got your date back to your place, they're already at least a little impressed. It's also possible (ie. certain) that your collection of Robert Jordan's Wheel Of Time will send any right-thinking potential romantic interest screaming into the night.

7. You can take old books that you no longer want to a book exchange to trade for new books, or at least new-to-you books.

True.

8. Or you can donate them to libraries or charity shops so they can continue to do good after you’re finished with them.

Granted.

9. Or you can leave them somewhere for others to pick up.

There is absolutely nothing stopping you from leaving your iPad 2 in a cafe for others to enjoy.

10. A book can be signed by the author.

When I was four years old I signed several books. Strangely, my parents didn't seem all that pleased.

11. Books can appreciate in value. Ever seen a bidding war for a version-1 pdf?

No, but the market in first editions is quite exclusive. 99.999999999999% of book buyers will never recoup anything more than a small fraction of the purchase price on any of their books.

12. The battery never runs out.

The battery life on e-ink readers is good enough that you would have to go to some trouble to run your battery flat.

13. Books weather and age. A book can tell a story quite apart from what is written in it.

True, if a little hyperbolic.

14. You can write a dedication in a book you give as a gift.

Agreed.

15. They have page numbers.

So do Kindle books. "Real" ones that don't change depending on font-size or whatever. As with lending, we can hope that it will be introduced to other platforms in time.

16. You can throw a bad book across the room, out the window or up a creek with minimal damage.

How often do you do this? Have you considered an anger management course?

17. You can tell when a book has been read and how much it has been returned to.

You've used this one already, Sherlock - see #13.

18. Books can be beautiful.

Agreed.

19. Books are biodegradable.

Nobody ever had to chop down a tree to make an ebook, and I've never heard of a dolphin choking on a PDF.

20. You can use cool bookmarks.

Isn't "cool bookmark" an oxymoron?

21. You can highlight passages or make notes by whatever means suit you.

I can highlight and make notes in an ebook without making a mess of the book.

22. Books are compatible with anything.

Kindle books can be read on a variety of devices, DRM-free epubs and PDFs can be also be read on different platforms. 

23. No DRM.

Three words: Parallel. Import. Restrictions.

Also, there are publishers that don't use DRM.

24. Books smell awesome.

Yes.

25. Books make a house feel like a home.

Yes.

26. Books have different fonts.

Depending on the platform, you can get this with ebooks too.

27. A well-loved book will naturally fall open at your favourite part.

This has never happened for me. How often has it happened for you? Usually my well-loved books just fall apart.

28. A cookbook can be open in the kitchen with minimal risk of damage from spatter.

Two words: Cling. Film.

29. If you buy a book from one store, you can still [buy] books from other stores.

The same is true of all ereaders I am familiar with. Most of the books I have on my iPad were purchased from online stores other than iTunes. (Many of them are DRM-free too).

30. Books come with their own customised dust jacket at no extra charge.

Well, the charge is kind of built in to the price.

31. Paper is not a proprietary format.

Neither is ePub or PDF.

32. You don’t have to worry that a newer, better version will come out next year.

Seriously, this is not something that keeps your average ereader owner awake at night. People that worry about such things will always worry about such things. True, buying an ereader will give them a new thing to obsess over, but maybe that's kind of a plus.

33. Books aren’t printed in Chinese sweatshops. (yet)

This is a rather spurious allegation, and even if true, it's not a brush you can tar all eReaders with.

34. Books don’t crash or need their OS updated.

I haven't had my iPad crash on me while reading a book.

35. Once you own a book, you own it. The store can’t take it off your shelf when the licencing arrangements change.

This happened ONCE and it was so embarrassing for Amazon that it's unlikely to ever happen again. I don't think it's even possible on non-Kindle eReaders.

36. Books don’t automatically update when you don’t want them to.

Automatic updates are not a feature of all platforms. In fact I don't think they are forced on any platform. In any case, meh.

37. Bookshelves are works of art.

I think the phrase you are looking for there is "can be", not "are". In any case, I agree that they can be decorative.

38. Books are tactile.

I can slap you upside the head with my iPad just as easily as with a book and it will hurt you just as much. Possibly more.

39. Books don’t need protection. They’re either flexible enough to take a bit of bending or hard enough to resist it.

With a suitable cover, eReaders are sufficiently robust for most people's needs.

40. Instant on.

The startup times for Kindle and iPad are so short that this is a really (another) minor quibble.

 

Filed under  //  ebooks   ereaders   ipad   kindle  
Posted

Protip: Don't waste your money on Gecko Guard screen protectors

They are so laden with static electricity that it is impossible to apply them without getting dust and hair stuck under them, resulting in massive, unsightly bubbles.

Posted

Two Observations On Sydney

1. When it rains it. Really. Fucking. Rains.

2. The Sydney stormwater drain system is not in itself terribly effective. However, it is supplemented by an innovative water dispersal system in which motorists splash as much water as they can onto pedestrians, who then carry it away in their shoes and waterlogged jeans.

Posted

You know your architecture is too complex when your arrows cross over (take 2)

Imag0138

This is an architecture diagram of just part of Lonely Planet's digital offerings. It was already looking overly complex, then the presenter had to cross the streams...

Filed under  //  lonely planet  
Posted

For @CherylAnneNY: Camera choices

A twitter friend is in the market for a camera. Here are my thoughts.


Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
 
Most likely this is the camera you want. For general photography you'll get great shots and the lens is nice and fast for working in marginal light conditions. The main weakness here is that it doesn't have a great zoom range (2.5x.)
 
Canon PowerShot G11
 
If you need a greater zoom range than the LX3, consider the Canon PowerShot G11. The G11 has a 4x zoom, but the lens is a little slower and while the image quality is technically better, shots straight from the camera lack the pop that the LX3 has. The G11 also has a swing-out LCD screen, which is incredibly useful for awkward angles (eg. shots over crowds.)
 
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS
 
The SX20 is the latest version of the camera that got me back into photography some years back (SX2 IS.) It's in the "ultra zoom" category, meaning it has a 20x zoom and an extremely close macro mode making it an extremely versatile camera. The main trade-offs are a slightly slower lens, increased lens distortion and "noisier" images. Like the G11, the SX20 has a swing-out LCD screen. In the case of the SX20, this is invaluable for macro photography.
 
Olympus EP-2
 
This camera is a digital version of the old Olympus Pen series. It has interchangeable lenses, fantastic image quality, and superb retro styling. It also has warts: slow focusing, no built-in flash, a less-than-stellar LCD screen and is probably more "fiddly" than the others. Also, it's a lot more expensive and you'd probably need to buy some accessories - a flash, a proper viewfinder, an extra lens, and a couple of matching shirts. This is the camera I would take to a fashion show, not so much for the shots, but for the cred.
 
UPDATE: Canon S90
 
A story that popped up in my RSS reader has brought the Canon S90 to my attention (story here.) The S90 is a direct competitor for Panasonic's LX3. It's more compact and has a greater zoom range and a fast lens. If you're leaning towards the LX3 from the above lineup, then you should consider the S90 as well.

Filed under  //  cameras  
Posted

Is it just me, or are political cartoonists a lot stupider these days?

Years ago I was of the view that most political cartoonists were astute satirists, but over the years I have found that this is far from the case. Take the following cartoon from Mark Knight, published in the Melbourne Herald Sun at Easter time.

430219-mark-knight-cartoon

There is nothing clever about this, or even remotely original. It's a blunt, brutish expression of the cartoonist's opinion - that atheism is a mean, joyless philosophy. It's also quite wrongheaded - atheism is not about denying anyone pleasure; it's about rejecting dysfunctional, irrational beliefs. Beliefs that not only diminish joy, but can even be quite harmful. 

Amusingly, the cartoonist has also scored an "own goal" - if you were to replace the word "atheists" with "christians," the statement would be equally true - adult christians do not believe that a rabbit goes around the world in the wee small hours of the first Sunday following the first full moon after the vernal equinox hiding chocolate eggs in houses and gardens. In fact, any christian parent in the western world that did believe such a thing would have some seriously disappointed children come Easter Sunday morning. Easter is generally presented as a christian festival, but the eggs, the rabbit, the buns, the timing, and even the name all derive from pagan traditions. In my memory of childhood, those were all the fun, joyful aspects of Easter, and the only tedious aspects of Easter were the christian bits.

Filed under  //  atheism   easter   media   politics   religion  
Posted

Why this guy is a douchebag

It's only a couple of days after it was released, but already there are reports of people wanting to return their iPads for a refund. Most are citing WiFi issues, but Nick O'Neill is different. He's not returning his iPad because of WiFi problems, or because it is in anyway faulty, or because it in any way fails to perform as advertised. No, Nick O'Neill is returning his iPad because he is a douchebag.

Nick calls it a case of "buyer's remorse," but if you read his story it's pretty clear that there is more to it. If it was just a case of him admitting that he'd got caught up in the hype and made an unwise purchase, then I'd agree it was a genuine case of buyer's remorse, but no, Nick has decided that:
  • most of the people who have been tweeting excitedly about their new iPad secretly feels exactly the same way he does,
  • only a millionaire could afford to own such a luxury item, (and even they are probably too busy to actually use it), and
  • Apple are failing to live up to their duty to "revolutionise magazines and textbooks on behalf of the publishers."
I kid you not, all this is pretty much from the horse's mouth. As an added bonus, Nick is going to divest himself of his shares in Apple because they spend their money building mediocre toys like iPads instead of alternative energy technologies.

Probably the most hilarious thing about the whole post is where he explains that the iPad is not going to be the same kind of game changer that the iPod was because it costs "four times the price of an iPod nano." I don't know who Nick O'Neill is, but I'm guessing he is about 11 years old because I clearly remember when the original iPod came out. It was by far one of the most expensive MP3 players on the market and probably not a hell of a lot cheaper than an iPad in real dollars.

Filed under  //  apple   douchebag   ipad  
Posted